THE GREEN PARTY MALAPPORTIONMENT PENALTY INITIATIVE (MAP)

The Malapportionment Penalty MAP initiative is to "Democratize the Electoral College" by enforcement of "the right to vote" Reconstruction amendment (Amend. XIV§2 ) that mandates a state's proportional allocation of presidential electors based on the popular vote split or for the state to suffer a "Reduction of Representation" in the electoral college / members to congress pursuant to (2USC§6) .
Collection of articles, stories, publications, notes, reports, tables,etc.


Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment allows for a state's representation in the House of Representatives to be reduced to the extent that state unconstitutionally denies people the right to vote.
_WIKIPEDIA (the Free Encycllopedia)

Title two United States Code Section 6 imposes a de jure mandate for the reduction of a state's representatives to Congress (and thus its Electoral College membership) should the right to vote at any election "named in the amendment to the Constitution, article 14,  section 2" be denied or abridged.

_WIKIPEDIA (the Free Encycllopedia)
A PROCLAMATION OF THE DC STATEHOOD GREEN PARTY TO REDRESS NATIONAL STATE INITIATIVES TO INSTITUTIONALIZE "MINORITY VOTE DILUTION" WHETHER RACIAL, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, OR BY THIRD PARTY AFFILIATIONS, BY THE ENACTMENT OF VOTER ID LAWS AND "WINNER-TAKE-ALL" POLITICS.
Gordon v. Cheney/Biden (7/28/2008-10), addressed Electoral College malapportionment (see Green Party press releases: http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=275). The current action Gordon et al v. Clerk, US House of Representatives, 1:11-cv-00003 ( Jan. 3rd, 2011) addresses the malapportionment of Congress. http://www.gp.org/press/pr-national.php?ID=412. -> http://www.electors.us/
Gordon et al v. Clerk, US House of Representatives _ "Democratize the Electoral College" vs. "Abolish the Electoral College"

- Asa Gordon /v/ Gary Michael Coutin, esquire

Winner-Take-All Systems
“Winner-take-all” is a term used to describe single member district and at large election systems that award seats to the highest vote getters without ensuring fair representation for minority groups. In the United States, these are typically single-member district schemes or at-large, block-voting systems. Under winner-take-all rules, a slim majority of voters can control 100% of seats, leaving everyone else effectively without representation. Winner-take-all systems are an anachronism in the modern world, as nearly every emerging democracy has rejected their use. They were introduced to America by the British during the colonial era, and are virtually unknown in other developed countries. Their failings lie at the root of many of our current political problems.
At-large voting denies voters an equally effective vote. At-large voting always operates to "minimize or cancel out the voting strength of racial or political elements of the voting population"[Fortson v. Dorsey, 379 U.S. 433, 439 (1965)] . At-large voting clearly operates to suppress the representation of minority groups, whether racial, economic, political, or otherwise.

E-2000
confederate electoral map 2000

"Winner-take-all" is a perverse form of political gerrymandering  of the franchise
by race and/or party affiliation. 
  "Winner-Take-All" is structurally anti-majoritarian, institutionally racially bias, and   concedes over half of the Presidential Electors needed to select the President of the United States of America to the former 11 states that formed the Confederate States of America. "Winner-Take-All" is institutionally racially bias because when the Southern states go red in Presidential Elections it only counts the nearly 27% of general election white votes cast in the former Confederate States, while disregarding the near 46% of the general election black votes cast in those states. "Winner-Take-All" is constitutionally deficient because it exposes the states to a reduction in state representatives pursuant to the mal-apportionment penalty of the Second section of the fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution for an abridgment of a citizens "right to vote".
_Asa Gordon, Exe.Dir. Douglass Institute of Government, Chair DCSGP Electoral College Task Force