The Malapportionment Penalty MAP initiative is to "Democratize the Electoral College" by enforcement of "the right to vote" Reconstruction amendment (Amend. XIV§2 ) that mandates a state's proportional allocation of presidential electors based on the popular vote split or for the state to suffer a "Reduction of Representation" in the electoral college / members to congress pursuant to (2USC§6) .



George Henry White
Member of the
U.S. House of Representatives
North Carolina's 2nd district

    White was elected to Congress in 1896. He was the last former slave to serve in Congress and by 1898 was the only African American in the House of Representatives. 
  At the turn of the last Century, Congressman George Henry White challenged the House to punish southern states for disfranchising blacks by calling for a reduction in their congressional delegations.
White’s appeal in 1899 that southern delegations to Congress ought to be limited to “the benefit of the votes that are allowed to be cast in their representation” initially fell on unsympathetic ears, despite his declaration, “It is a question that this House must deal with some time, sooner or later.” Derived from Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, reduction legislation required Congress to penalize states that sought to disqualify eligible voters by subtracting that class of disfranchised voters from the population count used to determine the number of seats each state was allotted in the House. At the high tide of Radical Republican rule in the House, the chamber passed a measure after the 1870 Census that required Congress to enforce that provision. Section 6 of the Apportionment Act of February 2, 1872, provided a mandate that the number of representatives apportioned to any state to be proportionally reduced, if the right to vote is denied or abridged.



Rep. Edgar D. Crumpacker
10th District Indiana
THE FACTS OF RECONSTRUCTION
John R. Lynch
Copyright, 1913,
by The Neale Publishing Company

John Roy Lynch (September 10, 1847 - November 2, 1939) was the first African-American Speaker of the House in Mississippi. He was also one of the first African-Americans elected to the U.S House of Representatives during Reconstruction, the period in United States history after the Civil War.

CHAPTER IX

WHAT CONSTITUTES
"NEGRO DOMINATION"*
  It is claimed that in States, districts, and counties, in which the colored people are in the majority, the suppression of the colored vote is necessary to prevent "Negro Domination,"—to prevent the ascendency of the blacks over the whites in the administration of the State and local governments....
And this brings us to a consideration of the question, What is meant by "Negro Domination?" The answer that the average reader would give to that question would be that it means the actual, physical domination of the blacks over the whites. But, according to a high Democratic authority, that would be an incorrect answer. The definition given by that authority I have every reason to believe is the correct one, the generally accepted one. The authority referred to is the late Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi, H.H. Chalmers, who, in an article in the North American Review about March, 1881, explained and defined what is meant or understood by the term "Negro Domination."
    According to Judge Chalmers' definition, in order to constitute "Negro Domination" it does not necessarily follow that negroes must be elected to office, but that in all elections in which white men may be divided, if the negro vote should be sufficiently decisive to be potential in determining the result, the white man or men that would be elected through the aid of negro votes would represent "Negro Domination." In other words, we would have "Negro Domination" whenever the will of a majority of the whites would be defeated through the votes of colored men. *

*"Negro Domination" phobia is the motivation behind State Voter ID laws.

CIVIL ACTIONS PLEADINGS_THE HISTORY LEGACY:
"A brief reflection on our past, in order to illuminate our present, so as to gain informed insight into our future."

Gordon et.al. v. Cheney/Biden (Jul. 28, 2008-10).
V. The History of the United States Constitutional Franchise Founded on Racial Quotas and Reconstruction Amendments Grounded in the Intent of the Declaration Should Inform the Court In Its Resolution of This Case.
The original intent of the constitutional framers of 1787 was to establish an electoral franchise predicated on racial quotas that disproportionately favored a southern white minority. ... pp.22-38.

VI. The Attorney General Invokes The Redemptionist Era Voting Rights Precedents that Reestablished Racial Supremacy and Ended Reconstruction.
"Can we forget for whom we are forming a government? Is it for men, or for the imaginary beings called States?"
James Wilson, author of U.S. Constitution. 30 June 1787.

 ...The Appellant's Brief warned that this court should be guided by: [The] jurisprudence of "Textualism" weighted and tempered by the "Original Intent" of the Reconstruction-era's constitutional framers rather than undue reliance on legal precedents. ... Indeed case law precedents in this regard are fraught with the danger of slippage into reliance on redemptionist-era court rulings which sustained the reestablishment of racial supremacy....pp.39-44

Gordon et.al. v. Clerk of the United States House of Representatives ( Jan. 3rd, 2011).
IV. THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE RECONSTRUCTION AMENDMENTS FRAMERS CONFIRMS PLAINTIFFS' STANDING AND CAUSE FOR REDRESS BY THE CLERK. .. 19 _PP. 20-25
"Gordon noted that the spirit of the infamous 1787 constitutional compromise known as the "3/5ths clause" survives in our time, that the Electoral College, as effected by the mechanism of "winner take all," has rendered the descendants of enslaved blacks as inert bodies who serve as little more than political ballast to inflate Southern political power today.The specter of the 3/5ths compromise that established an institutionalized Constitutional franchise by racial quotas haunts every modern day presidential election. The original Constitution's "covenant with death" that established an augmented white elective prerogative is now preserved by "Winner take All" in the unbounded former Confederate states ...


FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DECLARATORY RELIEF_PP.3-5
The "Negro" Electoral Slush Fund.
Let us be honest, the purpose of the Electoral College was to create a Negro Electoral Slush Fund to establish and sustain white supremacy, and a great deal of our jurisprudence in this matter is in denial of this historical truth. That is one other reason why this is a case of first impression, it does not shy away from this historical legacy of infamy. ...




Winner-Take-All Systems
“Winner-take-all” is a term used to describe single member district and at large election systems that award seats to the highest vote getters without ensuring fair representation for minority groups. In the United States, these are typically single-member district schemes or at-large, block-voting systems. Under winner-take-all rules, a slim majority of voters can control 100% of seats, leaving everyone else effectively without representation. Winner-take-all systems are an anachronism in the modern world, as nearly every emerging democracy has rejected their use. They were introduced to America by the British during the colonial era, and are virtually unknown in other developed countries. Their failings lie at the root of many of our current political problems.
At-large voting denies voters an equally effective vote. At-large voting always operates to "minimize or cancel out the voting strength of racial or political elements of the voting population"[Fortson v. Dorsey, 379 U.S. 433, 439 (1965)] . At-large voting clearly operates to suppress the representation of minority groups, whether racial, economic, political, or otherwise.